SPEED
SPIRIT
FIREPOWER
REBIRTH
26 Likes
Take to new level of supercar!
Geroug Raver
High rpm 6.9L DOHC valve 32 V8, produce 770 Hp in naturally aspirated!
Fully carbon fiber monocoque! Weight 1160 kg!
Electronic suspension! With new Road Prediction Shock Absorbers AI System!
Four motor power active aerodynamics! Top speed 403 KPH!
3 Likes
16 Hours Remaining (because I missed the 24 hour post)
16 hours remain to submit your entries to TMCC36. Since the last post, I have recieved entries from-
Complete Submissions-
@Riley
@the-chowi
@LennoxV10
@Eldritch
@abg7 and @Kitami
@JLKpro
@VaporRossa
.car, but no ad-
7 Likes
Sheesh, if I were the one judging this competition I know who Iβd pick. Phenomenal build, love that side especially lots
2 Likes
Bomboclaaaaaaat 
7 Likes
That thing reminds me of a modern (2020+ AD) interpretation of what your CSC67 entry would have been if it not only lacked a dual tandem front axle, but also had its engine on the opposite side (mid-mounted, not front-mounted).
Submissions Closed
Submissions for TMCC36 have now closed. I have received final submissions from-
Complete Submissions-
@azkaalfafa
@Nebulon
@LoLking
@Nolan_Cables
@PhirmEggplant
@Mausil
@Ne0
@Er_Foxone
@Sharcc
@ErenWithPizza
@Riley
@the-chowi
@LennoxV10
@Eldritch
@abg7 and @Kitami
@JLKpro
@VaporRossa
@Koviico
@OT_motive
.car, but no ad-
@Tsundere-kun and @66mazda
@iivansmith
@Oreology
@supersaturn77
@KSIolajidebt and @Texaslav
@SpeedyBoi, @Falling_Comet, @variationofvariables, @yurimacs and @Xepy
@chiefzach2018 and @Portalkat42
@stocazzoo
Starting now, entrants who havenβt posted an ad will have 12 hours to post one here in the thread.
17 Likes
β¦ Specs
Specifications
β§ 4.2 L DOHC, Twin Turbo Boxer 6
β§ 725.9 horsepower @ 6600 RPM
β§ 611.9 Ft-Lb of torque @ 6100 RPM
β§ 1231 Kg
β§ 8 speed DCT
β§ 20 in alloy rims with rear carbon turbofans, (275/35R20 F/345/30R20 R)
β§ 2.42 sec 0-60
β§ 9.43 sec 1/4 mile
β§ 247 mph top speed
β§ 1.4 G short(20m) cornering Gs
β§ 2 G long(200m) cornering Gs
Β© 2024 Aether V.A. & Β©2024 ZACSPEED, All Rights Reserved
36 Likes
cant wait to see it with the bumpers and hood on XD
(Killer work amigo)
Cascina Duradal
26 Likes
X Hoffsman Rattlesnake X
Collab between @KSIolajidebt & @Texaslav
Details
- sub-3000 lb weight
- exact 50/50 weight distribution
- Rear mounted transaxle
- 7-speed transaxle manual
- naturally aspirated crossplane V8 capable of 9000+ rpm
- 2.9s to 60
- 230 mph top-out
- active shock absorbers and stabilizer bars
- Does one hell of a burnout
- Modern technology doesnβt stop this car from trying to kill you
- Rawest car on the road
36 Likes
Overview.
Summary.
800hp
800Nm
9000rpm Redline
8-Speed DCT w/ AWD
0-100 : 2.0s
80-120 : 0.9s
1/4 Mile : 9.0s
1km : 16.47s
Carbon Monocoque w/ Carbon Panels
Pushrod Suspension
11.2 L/100km
1273kg
41% / 59%
42 Likes
Burst and scramble, weβre instant lovers. Body and mind, wrapped and twisted in stupid. The dearly undead, be a ghost, thatβs the rules. Peekaboo, knock-knock, alight that spark, thatβs the answer βk? Aha! Why donβt you kiss up and shake your cottontail? A pop cuddle snuggle, hum a tune why donβt you? Itβs out of place, put away your jealousy. Thirsty? Ugh, so corny! If you get lonely, find anybody, just get lucky. I loathed to love but it gave me life, gonna be a smitten mitten till the day you die?
Handmade with love by members of the Sendo Team
@SpeedyBoi @yurimacs @variationofvariables @Xepy @Falling_Comet
FOR MOBILE VIEWERS: DISPLAY IN LANDSCAPE MODE
εεΊ¦γγΌγ γζθ¬γγ¦γγΎγγ
γγγγ¨γ
42 Likes
[BANG BANG]
CAM ON KINGSMAN
[BANG BANG]
SCOR SOM FACKIN GOALS
[BANG BANG]
also posting right after sendo got me fucked up bro i'm so cooked ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ lol
Redefine your hero.
We know what we're doing.
We know what we're doing.
In 2008, the reign of the Ventus Kingsman came to an end.
In 2011, we took back the throne and redefined what it means to be a Kingsman.
Now, we have redefined what it means to be a hero.
In 2011, we took back the throne and redefined what it means to be a Kingsman.
Now, we have redefined what it means to be a hero.
For king and country.
Kingsman stands alone at the forefront of our lineup with the unmatched 10R.A V10 unbound by the delays of forced induction. We call it the Caged Angel.
The roaring power of this beast is sent through a state-of-the-art dual-clutch transmission and into a computer-controlled all-wheel drive system. Advanced tyre compound engineering keeps everything in check.
A body and chassis made of aluminium and carbon fibre components provide unmatched weight savings while keeping the structure rigid and safe. Even with all its fury, the 10R will always have your back.
A handmade interior stitched together with precision and care, featuring the most advanced entertainment and information centre we have devised. Everything about the new Kingsman is at your fingertips.
All you have to do is grasp it.
And all that for a mere $92,000?
Well, of course. We wouldnβt lie to you.
Β©2024 Ventus Road Cars LLC, a member of Ting Motor Group
7 Likes
TMCC 36 - Round 0
@LoLking - LARE LK8
The Network tried reaching out to LARE to request an LK8, but the contact information they were given seemed to be incorrect, and had to move on.
End Result - Binned. Does not follow the listed naming scheme in the brief.
@PhirmEggplant - FENIC GT 4
When The Network tried to request a GT 4, they learned that there was a stop-sale order on all 2024MY GT 4s because they were using emissions defeat devices to meet current federal emissions guidelines.
End Result - Binned. Does not meet WES 9 as per the rules.
@LennoxV10 - Geroug Raver
When The Network tried to contact Geroug, they learned that all 2024MY Ravers were being recalled due to a safety issue discovered in manufacturing, and they wouldnβt be able to provide a model in time for The Network, meaning they had to move on.
End Result - Binned. Rules state that all cars must have standard 10s safety at a minimum, you only have basic 10s safety.
@stocazzoo - 333 Coupe B3/PD
The Network tried reaching out to request a Coupe B3/PD, but learned that 2024MY models were fitted with the wrong intakes, and thus were undergoing a recall and would not be able to provide a car in time, so The Network had to move on.
End Result - Binned. Rules stats that no race parts are allowed; you had race intakes on your engine.
TMCC 36 - Round 1
@Nebulon - MAG Ryno
The next day, The Networkβs interns started looking at the next batch of cars, and first up was the MAG Ryno. Going through some reviews, The Interns found that reviewers felt that the headlights were far too big, a design that lacks depth, and on the road it isnβt very pleasant to drive, nor does it feel too sporty. In other reviews, they found that the projected reliability was expected to be very low, and it wasnβt particularly safe either. With that, The Interns moved to the next car.
End Result - Eliminated. Poor drivability, reliability, safety and middle of the road sportiness in combination with a design thatβs marred by headlights that are too large and a design that lacks depth ultimately pull this one out of contention.
@Nolan_Cables - Apex Flow
Next up on The Internsβ list was the Apex Flow. In the reviews that they read, The Interns found that the Apexβs design wasnβt well received, with particular vitriol directed at the over usage of the same vent design around all corners of the design and the reverse rake, making the front of the car seem higher than the rear. Reviews werenβt too impressed with the performance, and while they enjoyed how easy it was to drive, it wasnβt very sporty. With that, The Interns struck the Apex from their list.
End Result - Eliminated. The design leaves something to be desired, with the overusage of the same vent fixture all around the car, reverse suspension rake that gives it an unfortunate Carolina Squat aesthetic. Drivability is great, but the choice to set the fuel map slider to 0 and lean out the engine tanked sportiness, an arguably more important stat in this challenge. For that reason, itβs out.
@Mausil - mCLARENe
Reviewing this one as myself, because yikes. The design is not good, it looks like a weird retromodern attempt at an A80 Supra, and engineering, while fine, is hampered by the fact that you left everything at default techpool, which ends up making it kind of expensive. Statistically, it does do well in some places like drivability and prestige, but falls behind elsewhere. For those reasons; End Result - Eliminated.
@Er_Foxone - Folgoretta Sprintosa
Next up on The Internsβ list was the Folgoretta Sprintosa. In the reviews that The Interns read, reviewers criticized the Sprintosaβs busy front fascia, the taillights that are too big and dominate the rear design, a transversely mounted engine thatβs predicted to be more difficult and expensive to service, and it doesnβt feel very sporty or prestigious for a supercar, and projected reliability is expected to be very poor. Because of that, The Interns scratched the Folgoretta off their list.
End Result- Eliminated. A design thatβs busy and features elements that are too large and dominate the front and rear fascias, engineering is kind of all over the map with a transverse V8 that messes with service costs, poor reliability, middle of the road performance and solidly average sportiness. The only good thing is the low purchase cost but thatβs counteracted by the very high service costs, and it isnβt enough to save it.
@Sharcc - Mako GTX
Next up on The Internsβ list is the Mako GTX. Skimming through reviews and ownerβs forums, reviewers complimented the front design, but directed complaints towards the weirdly sloped rear and badly shaped diffuser, and when it comes to taking it out on the road, owners criticized the GTXβs reliability, with many remarking that their cars were in and out of the shop, with the driving experience not really making up for it, as it doesnβt feel very sporty. Performance was a highlight, but that was really the only thrill that owners have gotten out of the Mako - a sentiment echoed by reviewers as well. Due to that, The Interns struck the Mako from their list.
End Result - Elimination. The design has some good ideas, but the front is messy, the rear shape is bad and too sloped with a diffuser that sticks out awkwardly from the rear. Engineering is fine, with good drivability and prestige, but mediocre sportiness, reliability and a high purchase price add up to too many strikes against the Mako, and for those reasons it isnβt going any further.
@Koviico - Armelia CM-3
Next up on The Internsβ list was the Armelia CM-3. Reviewers praised the design, with compliments directed at the front fascia in particular, but some minor complaints directed at the simple side design, and a rear that doesnβt quite fit the front. However, the biggest complaints were directed at its drivability, which while alright, does trail behind some of the CM-3βs competitors, mediocre reliability, extremely poor comfort and a lack of prestige relative to its competition all unfortunately take the CM-3 out of contention. For that reason, The Interns had to pass.
End Result - Elimination. While the design is fine, and if I were judging on design alone the Armelia would likely make it further along, but slightly below average drivability, well below average reliability, prestige and comfort, and not enough wins in other areas ultimately keep me from moving it further along in the competition.
@Eldritch - Eldritch Urizen RE
Next up on The Internsβ list is the Eldritch Urizen RE. Looking through some reviews and owner reports, The Interns found that the Urizen was solidly average from a performance standpoint, but didnβt feel particularly sporty against the competition, but it did feel relatively prestigious and was decent to drive normally. However, owners have reported that the Urizen was decently unreliable and not very fuel efficient. More than all of that though, the biggest amount of complaints were directed at the Urizenβs design, with many reviewers complaining that that it was too simple, the wheels are too far inset, and a rear design that just didnβt work. Because of that, The Interns struck it from their list.
End Result - Elimination. Engineering is a bit of a mixed bag, with only a few areas at or slightly above average, and well below average sportiness, reliability and fuel economy. However, the bigger issue was the design, which lacks effort and focus, with wheels that are way too far inset, a front design thatβs busy and doesnβt work well visually, and a very bare and simple rear. With design being a 4-star priority, I canβt justify moving it further along in the competition.
@JLKpro - Pearce Falconer
Next on The Internsβ list is the Pearce Falconer. Looking through some reviews, positives were directed at the very low purchase price, however thatβs really where the positives end - performance statistics are fine, but 20m skidpad numbers are well behind the competition, it isnβt as sporty as some reviewers would like, safety and comfort lag behind the pack, and projected service costs are expected to be well above average. Some criticism was leveled at the design as well, which is too horizontal and lacks some detail, and for the most part doesnβt keep up with the competition. For those reasons, The Interns had to strike it from the list.
End Result - Elimination. Design is fine, but it lacks some detail, the whole thing is too horizontal visually which limits how sporty it looks, and ultimately itβs kinda boring. Engineering is another issue, with generally okay performance stats, but well below average 20m grip, sportiness, prestige and comfort, slightly below average safety, and while itβs very cheap to purchase, service costs are well above average. For those reasons, I canβt move this one any further.
@OT_motive - CELSIUS 6s
Reviewing this one as myself again, because I canβt spin it any better. The design is fine, and just judging on design, this could have gotten into the semi-finals very easily. However, engineering is a disaster. Every single stat besides performance on your car is the worst in the entire competition, it uses less than half the budget, leaves a buttload of techpool on the table, and ultimately adds up to a laundry list of mistakes that keep your car from making it any further, so for those reasons; End Result - Eliminated.
Writerβs Note- the next part will unfortunately be delayed by a few days, as Iβm going on a brief vacation this weekend and wonβt have my computer or my laptop. Everyoneβs stats have been taken down, and thankfully there werenβt too many entries so as soon as Iβm back home Iβll be able to continue with the results and get them out ASAP.
29 Likes
If it werenβt for their rule breaks, the first four bins would most likely not have made it past round 1 anyway for aesthetic reasons.
Also, if there was a βstone age awardβ for underuse of tech pool, it would go to the Celsius 6S:
If you have a generous tech pool allocation, distribute it so that you get as close to (but not above) 100% of it with the settings you chose, or youβll end up with a dud, as shown here:
Unless the emission setting didnβt export i donβt see how i failed to meet the wes rating? Iβve got wes12 cleared and if it reset the emission tab it fails by 2% with 153mg/km over the 150 max for wes9?
Either way, great cars from all entries as usual.