FINAL RESULTS
13 @Mausil: 0 Points → you are still a beginner, that´s totally fine, and the update affected you.
11 @UnderlovedGhost: 1 Point → yep, the update took a lot of potential from this car.
11 @HermannMatern: 1 Point → it was worth a try, wasn´t it? Not too far off from frequent scorers. Drivability was quite good.
10 @Vento : 11 Points → Seems disappointing considering where you end up elsewhere. But racing challenges are really very different from QFC, CSR, etc. I am quite low scoring here too, so I decided to host instead of compete in racing. It should be said that this car tops at both drivability and reliability, if I decided for another system including a bonus, it would have been far up I guess. Unless I included design as a judging factor 
9 @machalel : 15 Points → quite a recovery after missing the first race because of a DQ. Penalties have hit quite hard, but still competetive.
8 @Snarklz : 17 Points → Solid midfield. Suffered a bit from penalties.
7 @Ludvig : 18 Points → good looking and capable. Both drivability and reliability are solid. Lacks racing engineering knowledge, so its basically the Vento situation in better and with good design.
6 @Danicoptero : 19 Points → The Tarske never had an hour to shine, but neither to disappoint. Successfully avoided penalties, too. With solid and steady results it managed to get quite far.
5 @Riley : 45 points → well, I guess if you are knowing what you do with real life race experience and knowledge about engineering for speed, its possible to score well with a speedbuild.
4 @AndiD : 50 points → Of course the Mara takes the reliability crown. Besides that, its also faster than the brands image would suggest. Two times bronze, mainly thanks to the strong engine.
3 @ErenWithPizza : 55 points → Two podiums as well, with one of them being silver. Doesnt just look like Lightning McQueen, its also equally fast and seems to have a rocket engine. Penalties however hit it hard. But I guess, if the stats were better, it wouldn´t have been that fast. Left budget on the table that could have spent for quality.
2 @Texaslav: 70 points → The only car to put the Nordwagen under pressure. Drivability and reliability were very good, among the top 3. A faster engine could have made it win in the last race.
1 @moroza and @DrDoomD1scord : 100 points. Scored everything that was possible. Do I need to say more? Propably not.
So, this was HTM 2000, I hope you have enjoyed it, and I am also open for honest opinions for a possible sequel in 2024 if I find time and motivation for it.